MANDATORY DETENTION:
Immigrants Detained and American
Families Pay the Price
THE ISSUE: The Illegal Immigration
Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) amended
the Immigration and Nationality Act by mandating that the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detain nearly all
immigrants who have committed a crime. The list of crimes
which subject an immigrant to mandatory detention is extensive,
and includes nonviolent crimes, crimes which occurred in the
distant past, and crimes for which no sentence was served. Mandatory
detention went into effect on October 9, 1998. Since that
time, many lawful permanent residents who have been in the United
States for many years and who have U.S. citizen family members
have been locked away indefinitely in INS facilities and local
jails with no possibility for release.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the mandatory
detention provisions enacted in the '96 law, INS could exercise
its discretion and decide to release an individual if it was
determined that the detainee posed no risk to society and was
likely to appear for proceedings. An Immigration Judge
could hear evidence about a detainees U.S family members,
length of residency in the U.S., and rehabilitation and decide
whether or not he or she deserved to be released. Both INS
and an Immigration Judge had the authority to release an
individual who posed no danger to the safety of others and was
likely to appear for future hearings. By mandating
detention without the possibility of release, IIRIRA took away
this discretion.
The mandatory detention provisions also
operate retroactively, according to the interpretation of some
Department of Justice representatives, and require the detention
of individuals who committed non-violent offenses, including some
misdemeanors, even years before IIRIRA became law. Many
long-time lawful permanent residents have been detained without
the possibility for release for offenses committed years ago.
Fundamental change in the mandatory
detention rules requires legislative action. Mandatory detention
of lawful permanent residents, however, has been found
unconstitutional by a majority of federal courts which have
considered the issue.
CURRENT STATUS: INS issued policy
guidance on October 7, 1998 indicating its detention priorities.
The INS memo began by stating that compliance with the mandatory
detention provisions is "virtually impossible," and
indicated that individuals released prior to the new detention
rules will not be targeted for re-detention. However, when
the INS comes into contact with an immigrant subject to mandatory
detention, for example during a citizenship interview or upon
return to the United States from a trip abroad, the immigrant is
likely to be taken into custody without the possibility for
release.