Still More on Ciudad Juarez IV Processing

Ciudad Juarez has advised AILA's State Dept. Liaison Committee that it WILL, after all, accept immigrant visa cases when no I-485 is pending, under its discretionary authority in accordance with the recent cable on "Processing I-140 Petitions for Applicants Residing in the U.S.". However, for the case to be accepted at this time, the I-824 must have been filed before 9/20/00. The consulate will review this cut-off date as it gets a better idea about demand.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 STATE 180792
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CVIS, CMGT

Subject: Processing I-140 Petitions for Applicants Residing in the U.S.

1. This is an action message. See Paragraph 8, 9 and 10.

2. Summary. In July, VO solicited information from IV processing posts about post procedures
for dealing with requests to process I-140 petitions for beneficiaries who are in the U.S. We
noted that the INS Service Centers have a backlog of I-140 petitions in which the beneficiaries
had originally filed for adjustment of status in the U.S., but have subsequently requested that
their petitions be transferred overseas for processing. This cable provides instructions to posts
on processing these cases. End Summary.

Service Center Backlogs of I-824 Cases

3. The INS Service Centers have a backlog of as many as several thousand "I-824 cases," I-140
petitions for which the beneficiaries, although now in the U.S., have filed an I-824 "request for
transfer of immigrant visa petition" to have their file transferred overseas for processing. In most
cases the applicants have sought the transfer because of the inordinately long waiting time for
adjustments (up to several years). Unfortunately, these applicants have found the I-824 backlog
to be nearly as lengthy, with the Service Centers taking well over a year to move these cases
out of the Centers and on to NVC.

4. As a result of this situation, a number of applicants and their attorneys have been approaching
posts directly (and indirectly via the Visa Office) requesting that their cases be processed under
posts' discretionary authority to accept cases for persons not resident in those consular districts
in "emergent or humanitarian situations." In addition, AILA has brought up this issue with the
Visa Office on a number of occasions over the past year. Some posts have been willing to
accept these, usually with the stipulation that the beneficiary was last resident in that consular
district (see paragraph 7). Other posts, citing heavy workloads, have been reluctant or have
simply refused to accept such cases.

Possible Decline in IV Cases for NVC

5. This backlog of I-824 cases has developed at the same time that INS has begun shifting its
concentration from naturalization to petition processing, specifically adjustment of status by
family members. The result of this shift will be a decline in cases passing through NVC to those
countries whose immigrant clientele are in these categories. While we have heard some
rumblings that INS may have a decline in I-130 processing early next year, for the short term
most IV posts are likely to experience a fall-off in workload. Such an INS-imposed drought has
the potential to cause a significant drop in workload over an extended period of time.

6. These two developments have led the Visa Office to conclude that we should work to
eliminate the backlog in I-140 cases for which beneficiaries have filed an I-824 request for
overseas processing. The total backlog is extremely small (less than 2,000 cases, per INS
figures), and the impact on posts of taking on this caseload would be minimal - most posts, in
fact, are unlikely to see any I-824 cases, as the majority of affected beneficiaries are from only a
handful of countries. The result of our informal email poll reinforce our belief that posts could
easily absorb this extra workload. Most respondents said that they would be willing to process
these cases, if they are not already doing so. Only a handful of posts have reported that their
workloads are so great that they cannot take on extra "out-of-district" cases.

What is a Non-Discretionary Case?

7. The regulations in 9 FAM 42.61(a) state that an alien applying for an immigrant visa "shall"
make application at the Consular Office having jurisdiction over the alien's place of residence.
Note n2.1 of that section adds that the last residence abroad is the residence of the applicant for
IV processing. A case in which the beneficiary was last resident in the country to which he is
applying for visa processing is not "discretionary," but (with specific exceptions) shall be
accepted by post for processing. The FAM defines "discretionary" cases as those of applicants
who were not last resident in the consular district.

Action Request: Non-Discretionary Cases

8. The Visa Office requests that posts which process IV's begin immediately accepting I-140
cases for which the beneficiary has filed an I-824 request for overseas processing and was last
resident in post's consular district. As noted above, such cases are not discretionary. If post is
approached by a beneficiary or attorney requesting such processing, post should first determine
if the beneficiary is eligible to have the case processed there. Posts do not have to have the
actual approved petition to process, as 9 FAM 42.42 authorizes officers to process immigrant
visa petitions on the basis of an I-797 "notice of approval" or telegraphic notification of petition
approval. For the sake of consistency as well as to forestall potential fraud, posts must accept
these cases only if the beneficiary can supply all of the following items:

Original I-797 notice of approval of the I-140 petition;
Copy of the I-140 petition ( a certified copy is not necessary;
Receipt for the I-824 to demonstrate the applicant has requested overseas processing;
Evidence the applicant was last resident in the host country of the post.

Action Request: Discretionary Cases

9. If post is approached by an I-140 beneficiary seeking overseas processing who is not
considered resident in that Consular district, post may/may accept the case on a discretionary
basis. We encourage posts to accept these cases for applicants who are homeless or facing
hardship as a result of long processing delays. Post should still require the original I-797 notice
of approval of the I-140 petition, copy of the petition, and receipt for the I-824 before agreeing
to accept the case. Post should also be satisfied the beneficiary will be able to remain in the host
country for a period of time sufficient to complete processing of the case.

Action Request: Post Unable to Accept New Cases

10. A handful of posts have informed VO that they are unable to take on any additional
caseload. We are sympathetic to these concerns and do not wish to place an additional burden
on posts already overwhelmed with work. If approached by an I-140 beneficiary seeking
overseas processing, these posts should notify the Visa Office (CA/VO/F/P) immediately of
their inability to assume extra cases. We will then designate another post or posts to assume to
case.

Madeleine Albright